Mesorat%20hashas for Zevachim 216:10

אמר ר"ל מחלוקת בד' וה' אברים דמר סבר כי כתיב לעשות אותו על השלם הוא חייב ואינו חייב על החסר אכל בהמה כתיב ומר סבר אכל אבר ואבר כתיב אבל אבר אחד דברי הכל אינו חייב אלא אחת

IF ONE OFFERED UP, THEN OFFERED UP AGAIN etc. Resh Lakish said: The controversy is about four or five limbs, one master holds that the text, to sacrifice it, [which teaches that] a person is liable on accou of a whole, but not on account of an incomplete one, is written in connection with the whole animal<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' One is liable only when he offers up the whole animal; therefore even if he offered up several limbs, he is liable to one offering only, viz., on account of the first, because the animal was still whole then.');">¹³</span> the other master holds that it is written in connection with each limb.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' One is liable only when he offers up a whole limb, but not when he offers up part of a limb. Hence each limb imposes a separate liability.');">¹⁴</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Zevachim 216:10. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.